A fire is always terrifying. However, even when the fire is finally put out, there is almost always significant damage to assess and remedy. While many rely on property insurance to address these issues, it’s not uncommon to find that the insurance provider is not as forthcoming with compensation as expected. For those dealing with such “bad faith” issues, a Los Angeles fire damage lawyer may be able to help.
There are ways for consumers to seek relief when they’re dealing with an insurance company that’s not living up to its obligations. However, these can be complicated and challenging cases. At Sawyer & Labar LLP, we understand the unique issues involved in seeking fair compensation from a bad faith insurance provider.
We help clients seek the funds that they’re owed, and we won’t allow you to accept an unfair settlement. Our skilled attorney, Ivo Labar, can take the claim to court so that you’re awarded the level of compensation you deserve.
The law provides a variety of protections for consumers who are faced with businesses taking advantage of them. Some of these protections apply particularly to the insurance industry, and they provide a means for filing a claim against insurance providers that fail to meet the expectations of the law. A lawyer can play a critical role in helping consumers leverage these protections to get the insurance compensation they are owed when faced with fire damage.
Insurance contracts and the laws that govern them are complicated, but as your lawyer, Ivo Labar is able to examine your policy and identify the responsibilities of the insurance provider. We can also consider assessments of the damage that you’ve suffered and determine whether your insurance provider is likely in violation of the law. If so, we can represent you throughout the legal process.
It’s common for bad faith insurance issues to be resolved out of court and through a negotiated settlement rather than going through the full litigation process. This is usually because there are often significant advantages for both sides in choosing to reach a settlement.
One of the advantages of a negotiated settlement for the insurance company is avoiding the inherent risk of litigation. When an issue is addressed through litigation, it leaves the decision in the hands of a third party. This means a risk of a ruling that’s not in their favor. For this reason, among others, insurance providers often choose to offer a settlement before a trial becomes necessary.
Another benefit of a settlement is typically the element of timing. The legal process can often be slow-moving, and it’s not uncommon for it to be a long period of time before the issue is eventually resolved. Settlements, though, can be reached relatively quickly if both sides are motivated to reach an agreement quickly. However, a quick process does not always mean a better outcome. We can fight for you in court if the other party does not offer a fair settlement.
Negotiations for your insurance coverage can be challenging and complicated, which makes having an experienced lawyer representing you a significant benefit. We understand the nuances of both the law and these types of negotiations. This means that we can put the right pressure on the other side while also recognizing when we’ve received the strongest offer possible and when to proceed with litigation.
The presence of an experienced trial lawyer can also have an impact on how the insurance company views the negotiation process. They may realize that they will not be able to get away with the same tactics they may use with an inexperienced negotiator. They also recognize that the threat of going to court is legitimate, which can lead to them taking the process a bit more seriously.
There are often cases in which it may not make sense to settle and take the offer on the table. Typically, this is because the offer is not enough to cover your expenses related to the fire damage. When this happens, it is a wiser option to turn to the legal process and seek the remedy you need through litigation.
In the process of representing you during litigation, we handle issues like filing the necessary paperwork and presenting your case in any hearings. We use our investigation of your case to argue that your interests align with the law, seeking the compensation that you are owed for the fire damage.
At the core of these types of insurance claims is the issue of the insurance company acting in “bad faith.” This is a broad term that addresses a variety of problems occurring when an insurance company fails to meet its obligations. When someone files a claim based on their policy, as would be done after fire damage, they should be properly compensated.
The key component of these issues is the agreement or insurance policy, that both you and the company have agreed to. Under these policies, the consumer may have some obligations, primarily their requirement to make the necessary payments on time. The insurance provider must pay out any valid claims. Failure to meet their obligations and the requirements of the law may mean that the insurance provider could be considered to be acting in bad faith.
Some of the more common forms of bad faith behaviors include:
The specifics of what an insurance plan may cover will often differ depending on the type of the plan, but most standard property insurance policies cover much of the damage caused by a fire up to the plan’s limits. Some of the different insurance plans that could be collected in the case of a fire include:
In a place like Los Angeles, where there is a higher risk of earthquakes, some fire damage may need to be collected through earthquake insurance. This could be the case if the fire was the result of an earthquake. Most standard property insurance policies don’t cover damage that can be shown to have been the result of an earthquake. However, many mortgages and loans for properties in high-risk areas for earthquakes require earthquake insurance.
If you’re fortunate, a fire may be quickly contained, and the damage may be minimized. However, fires have the ability to spread quickly and may cause significant issues. There’s a range of different types of damages and expenses related to fires that may be covered under property insurance. However, it’s important to understand that exactly what will be covered depends on the policy agreement in place.
Some of the most common forms of expenses related to fires include:
Fire damage is among the most impactful property damage that anyone can face, often leaving a home uninhabitable or a business unable to function properly. Even when the damage from the fire itself is minimized, the firefighting efforts can leave a property in need of repairs. With such a significant need for compensation for these damages, it can be frustrating when an insurance provider seems to not be meeting their obligations.
At Sawyer & Labar LLP, we work with those facing fire damage and a resistant insurance company to seek the compensation they are owed. We understand the unique challenges involved in seeking full compensation from an insurance provider.
However, we’re prepared to make a stand for what our clients deserve. Ivo Labar, our talented attorney, is an experienced litigator who can fight aggressively on your behalf in the courtroom. To discuss your case and how we may be able to help, contact us today.